When starting for the first time, should you invest all your money at once, or drip feed it into your portfolio? Opinions vary.
One recent study of the period since 1982 shows that anyone investing a lump sum in one go would have done better up till now than someone making regular staged payments. The reason is that the capital would have had longer to grow.
Others argue such a strategy is too dangerous. Of course, they object, it seems to work if you look at a bull market like the one since 1982. But at certain other times it would have been a disaster. Had you put all your money into the market on the eve of the Crash of '29, you would have had to wait until 1958 to break even, after taking inflation into account! For most people, that represents a lifetime of investing.
But it has also been calculated that, if you had kept on investing equal amounts in each of those 30 years, you would have made a compound annual gain of 13%. This is the strategy known as 'pound-cost averaging'. By putting fixed amounts into shares on a regular basis, you will sometimes buy them when they are cheap, sometimes when they are dear. Overall, your costs will average out.
Pound-cost averaging is an automatic way of ensuring you do not overpay. This is demonstrated by the 13% annual gain you would have made following this strategy in 1929-1958, as against 0% using the lump sum approach.
But the most sensible course of action obviously lies between these two extremes. There is no reason why you cannot have the best of both worlds by following these guidelines:
Book offers!
|
|
Public Private Partnerships
E. R. Yescombe |
| Our price: £42.49
Normally: £49.99 |
|
|
Cash Flow Forecasting
Andrew Fight |
| Our price: £24.99
Normally: £24.99 |
|
|
Fear, Greed and Panic
David Cohen |
| Our price: £20.99
Normally: £29.99 |