In Beyond the Zulu Principle, says,
"The oldest and best axiom in investment is to run profits and cut losses - that way profits are likely to be large and losses are bound to be small."
Never has there been a rule more honoured more in the breach than the observance. Sadly, every study on this subject shows that private investors tend to sell what they should have kept, and keep what they should have sold. This is what Peter Lynch memorably describes as pulling up the flowers while watering the weeds.
It is easy to demonstrate arithmetically why this is a bad policy. Suppose you have a portfolio of 10 shares and your annual profit target is 15%. Then say one share drops by 20%. Suddenly, your other 9 shares have to make, not 15% on average, but 19% for you to make your target. The further your single loser falls, the worse it gets.
Example
This table shows how fast the required average rises as that one loss increases, for two sample portfolios with targets of 15% and 20%:
| Winners have to make (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Loser falls (%) | For 15% average | For 20% average |
| 10 | 17.8 | 23.2 |
| 20 | 18.9 | 24.4 |
| 30 | 20.0 | 25.6 |
| 40 | 21.1 | 26.7 |
| 50 | 22.2 | 27.8 |
By the time one of your 10 shares has halved, the other 9 have to average 22% apiece just to make a modest 15% target. They have to do half as much work again as you were asking from them originally. If your target is 20%, any single loss above 30% means you need your winners to beat Warren Buffett's 40-year average of 25.6%.
You are no longer on Mission Achievable, you are on Mission Impossible.
Recommend ReadingBook offers!
|
|
The Gods That Failed
Larry Elliot, Dan Atkinson |
| Our price: £8.44
Normally: £12.99 |
|
|
The Logic of Life: Uncovering the New Economics of Everything
Tim Harford |
| Our price: £12.53
Normally: £18.99 |
|
|
Trading The US Markets
Paolo Pezzutti |
| Our price: £16.49
Normally: £24.99 |